Culture of Money: Andrew Wilshire

There are many ways to learn about a culture beyond focusing on its menu, its music and its inhabitants. Writers can also learn a great deal about a country and its people by studying how that country values its money. Andrew Wilshire, renowned precious metals expert, hosts a blog with interesting insight on the world’s economic view on gold, other precious metals and paper money.

Have you ever wondered what the government’s ability to print more money really does to the value of the dollar? What does that mean for other country’s economic view of the U.S? By examining Andrew Wilshire’s blog and other written commentary, writers can capture the right mindset for plotting their fiction stories. Many writers involve the pursuit of money as an ongoing motivation in their stories, why not make that driving force more realistic by conducting the necessary research to accurately understand the world’s view of currency not only in the U.S but abroad as well. If the pursuit of money is your fictional plot’s aim, Investment specialists like Andrew Wilshire can provide economic perspectives from which many suspenseful tales can be spun.

 

Some Other Articles You May Enjoy

2 Comments

  • At 2009.01.21 15:40, Buddy dNo Gravatar said:

    You really need to know about Andrew Wilshire’s financial Fraud conviction as described below. verify at http://www.cftc.gov.

    Washington, D.C. — The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    (CFTC) announced today that the Honorable Donald M. Middlebrooks of
    the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida issued a
    final judgment against Wilshire Investment Management Corporation, Inc.
    (WIMC), a Florida corporation; its president and CEO, Andrew Alan
    Wilshire of Jupiter, Florida, and employees Eric Scott Malcolmson and
    James Joseph Russo of Tequesta and Palm Beach Garden, Florida,
    respectively; and National Commodities Corporation, Inc. (NCC) of Fort
    Lauderdale, Florida. The court denied defendants’ Motion to Amend the
    final judgment on June 1, 2006.
    The final judgment trial order, entered on December 5, 2005, followed
    a four-day bench trial stemming from a complaint filed by the CFTC on
    September 14, 2004. The complaint alleged that the defendants
    fraudulently solicited customers by misrepresenting the likelihood of
    realizing large profits from commodity options trading and
    misrepresenting the risk involved in trading commodity options (see
    CFTC News Release 4997-04).
    The final judgment order found Malcolmson and Russo committed
    solicitation fraud in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act and
    Commission regulations and held WIMC vicariously responsible for its
    employees’ conduct. The order also held WIMC president, Andrew Alan
    Wilshire, liable on two theories-as a controlling person and for
    failing to diligently supervise WIMC employees. The order found that
    Wilshire knew of his employees’ fraudulent sales practices or that
    Wilshire was “willfully blind” to these practices. The order also
    held defendant National Commodities Corporation, WIMC’s guarantor,
    jointly and severally liable for WIMC’s violations.
    Specifically, the court found that since at, least from September
    2000, WIMC, Wilshire, Malcolmson, and Russo fraudulently solicited customers
    by misrepresenting the likelihood of large trading profits and
    downplaying the risks involved in trading commodity options, and by
    linking profit expectations to well-known weather events, seasonal
    trends, and historical prices. For example, according to the order,
    Malcolmson claimed to help his clients “double or triple” their
    money, turning $5,000 and $10,000 accounts into $100,000 — even
    though 88 percent of his clients lost money between 2000 and 2004, with the
    largest gain realized by any of his clients of approximately $8,000.
    In ruling against the defendants, the court rejected WIMC’s argument
    that their written risk disclosure statements signed by the customers
    balanced exuberant descriptions of profit potential.
    Sanctions Ordered Total More than $500,000
    The court ordered the defendants to pay a total of $147,891.99 in
    restitution to eight defrauded customers and imposed a $100,000 civil
    penalty against each of the three individual defendants and a $100,000
    civil penalty against WIMC-for which the National Commodities
    Corporation guarantor is jointly and severally liable. This type of
    liability means NCC may have to satisfy the entire judgment amount if
    the other defendants cannot pay.
    Based on the court’s finding that defendants’ behavior was blatant,
    brazen, and repeated, the order also permanently prohibits Wilshire,
    Malcolmson, and Russo from engaging in any commodity-related activity
    in the future.

    • At 2009.01.21 17:58, LMReviewsNo Gravatar said:

      Thank you so much for taking the time to post. The information you’ve posted makes personas like Andrew Wilshire and others even more interesting when forming the complexities of our characters. Our characters shouldn’t be perfect and often aren’t. As in real life our characters may not do what is right but hopefully by the end of the work we can show the lessons learned and a change in behavior toward the positive. This blog would never seek to provide investment or tax advice, it is strictly geared toward what real multicultural perspectives we can learn from others.

      Sable Lit Reviews is using WP-Gravatar